Benjamin Thomas George vs Noah Schachter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 13 Mar at 02:55 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

B. Thomas George vs N. Schachter

Benjamin Thomas George
Benjamin Thomas George

Flag CAN CAN

l
w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
l
Noah Schachter
Noah Schachter

Flag USA USA

l
l
l
l
l
l
l
l
w
w

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

22
Age
26
-
Height
-
900
C. Rank
800
826
Best Rank
654
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: George 1 - 0 Schachter

They have played 2 sets in total, with Benjamin Thomas George winning 2 and Noah Schachter winning 0. The last match between Benjamin Thomas George and Noah Schachter was at the M15 Montreal, 13-03-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Benjamin Thomas George getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
George1
Schachter0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2M15 Montreal(03-13-25)

I.hard
CAN Flag
Benjamin Thomas George
6
6
USA Flag
Noah Schachter
3
3

B. T. George vs N. Schachter H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
44.94% (40-49)Career Total W/L51.79% (130-121)
1Indoor0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

B. T. George vs N. Schachter Match Preview:

In evaluating the upcoming tennis match between George and Schachter, several key performance indicators reveal intriguing insights. Over the past six months, George has won 39.56% of points on their second serve, while Schachter has secured 44.13% in the same category. These second serve statistics are closely linked to match prediction accuracy, offering a glimpse into potential performance outcomes.

A close examination of return game statistics indicates that George, of late, has captured 49.62% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Schachter's 45.4%. Meanwhile, in first serve returns, George leads with 28.64% as opposed to Schachter’s 25.72%. These metrics provide a clear advantage in predictions regarding head-to-head matchups.

Pressure scenarios also play a significant role in determining match outcomes. George has managed to save 51.28% of breakpoints faced recently, whereas Schachter demonstrates a slightly higher breakpoint saving ability at 56.72%. These statistics underline the importance of mental fortitude during critical game moments.

When assessing match performance over the past year, George has won 43.59% of matches played, with a win-loss record of 17/22, while Schachter boasts a higher success rate, winning 50.77% of matches with a record of 33/32. This win-loss data contributes to an overall head-to-head projection.

Surface preference can influence performance considerably. George finds comfort on clay courts, achieving a career win percentage of 54% (7/6), whereas hard courts pose a challenge with a 46% success rate (13/15). In contrast, Schachter excels on hard surfaces, reflected in a 58% career win rate (78/57), with clay being less favorable at 49% (29/30).

Throughout the last year, George has predominantly participated in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments, securing 42.86% of match victories (15/20). Meanwhile, Schachter has competed in a similar range of tournaments, claiming 53.33% of wins (24/21). This context underscores the level of competition each player typically faces.

In the context of opponent quality, over the last year, George has come up against opponents with an average rank of 347.36. Schachter, on the other hand, has faced slightly stronger competition with an average opponent rank of 339.92.

In deciding sets, Schachter holds a significant edge, winning 55% of these critical sets over the past year, contrasted with George's 33%. This could play a crucial role in live betting scenarios, as the match approaches its climax.

Converting breakpoint opportunities speaks to a player's aggression and tactical acumen. George has converted 34.44% of breakpoints recently, while Schachter has achieved a conversion rate of 31.88%. Hence, George shows a slight advantage in capitalizing on these game-turning chances.

Based on the comprehensive statistical analysis, Schachter is projected to have the upper hand in this matchup, given their superior recent form, consistency in high-pressure situations, and overall match-winning percentage. However, tennis is never predictable, and each point counts towards the ultimate outcome.

Benjamin Thomas George vs Noah Schachter Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

B. T. George vs N. Schachter H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won6
0Aces (Total)6
3Total Double Faults2
1:39:3Average Match Time1:39:3
70% (42/60)1st Serve %63% (41/65)
64% (27/42)1st Serve Win %59% (24/41)
67% (12/18)2nd Serve Win %42% (10/24)
50% (4/8)Break Pts Won %25% (1/4)
48% (31/65)Return Points Win %35% (21/60)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: George 42%, Schachter 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: George 54%, Schachter 50%.
Break Points Saved %: George 53%, Schachter 54%.

B. T. George Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardDrummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025

Q1

USAS. Kirchheimer
L
6-1 1-6 7-6(5)
I.hardM25 Montreal - 03-11-2025

R2

DENO. Brostrom
L
6-7(6) 6-3 6-2

R1

USAK. Poling
W
7-5 6-7(6) 6-2
I.hardM15 Trois-Rivieres - 27-10-2025

R1

FRAG. Dalmasso
L
6-1 6-2
ClayM25 Zaragoza - 29-09-2025

R1

ESPI. Almazan
L
6-3 6-4

N. Schachter Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM25 Cochabamba - 17-11-2025

Q3

BOLD. Eduardo
W
6-3 7-6(6)

Q1

BOLC. Javier
W
6-2 6-0
I.hardChampaign Challenger - 10-11-2025

Q1

USAM. Latak
L
6-4 4-6 6-2
I.hardKnoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025

Q1

USAQ. Vandecasteele
L
6-3 6-3
I.hardCharlottesville Challenger - 27-10-2025

Q1

USAK. Smith
L
6-4 6-3
banner

B. T. George vs N. Schachter Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
44.94% (40/49)YTD Win/Loss51.79% (130/121)
44.85% (87/107)Sets Win/Loss52.10% (298/274)
48.76% (848/891)Games Win/Loss51.30% (2735/2596)
41.67% (15/21)Hard Win/Loss55.13% (86/70)
46.88% (15/17)Clay Win/Loss49.23% (32/33)
47.62% (10/11)Indoor Hard W/L40.00% (12/18)
0.08Aces Per Game0.31
64Aces Total800
0.45Double Faults Per Game0.24
384Total Double Faults626
1:38:56Average Match Time1:15:46
370.57Average Opponent Rank351.21
62% (3232/5189)1st Serve %60% (7399/12278)
61% (1966/3232)1st Serve Win %68% (5066/7399)
44% (853/1957)2nd Serve Win %47% (2269/4879)
45% (278/611)Break Points Won % (Total)41% (482/1188)
44% (2330/5237)Return Points Win %40% (4819/12187)
38.46% (5/8)Challenger W/L37.50% (15/25)
46.05% (35/41)Futures W/L54.50% (115/96)
42% (35/83)Best of 3 Sets Win %52% (129/249)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (1/1)
41% (7/17)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)57% (25/44)
45% (9/20)Deciding Set Win %46% (32/70)
86% (43/37)1st Set Won, Won Match84% (133/112)
14% (43/6)1st Set Won, Lost Match16% (133/21)
7% (46/3)1st Set Lost, Won Match15% (118/18)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

04:05 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
THAK. Samrej
JPNR. Sakamoto2
W1
3.74
W2
1.22
05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
BRAM. P. D. Almeida
ARGN. Kicker7
W1
1.62
W2
2.13
04:05 AM 18/11/25
Prediction
JPNK. Isomura
JPNY. Kusuharaq
W1
1.83
W2
1.85
04:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
FRAM. Erhard4
GBRM. Summersq
W1
1.35
W2
2.88
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
NEDJ. Sels6
TUNA. Ouakaaq
W1
1.24
W2
3.56
05:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction
ARGA. Collarini8
ARGM. Kestelboim
W1
1.39
W2
2.72